Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

µÎ°¡Áö ¹ü¿ëÁ¢ÂøÁ¦ÀÇ Àû¿ë¹æ¹ý¿¡ µû¸¥ °áÇÕ°­µµ

Shear bond strength of universal adhesives using different modes of application

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úÀç·áÇÐȸÁö 2017³â 44±Ç 4È£ p.299 ~ 309
±èÇöÇÏ, ÃÖÀ¯¸®³ª, ¹Ú¼öÁ¤,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±èÇöÇÏ ( Kim Hyeon-Ha ) - ¿ø±¤´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇк´¿ø Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç
ÃÖÀ¯¸®³ª ( Choi Yoorina ) - ¿ø±¤´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇк´¿ø Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç
¹Ú¼öÁ¤ ( Park Su-Jung ) - ¿ø±¤´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇк´¿ø Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç

Abstract

º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â µÎ °¡Áö ¹ý¿ëÁ¢ÂøÁ¦ÀÇ Àû¿ë¹æ¹ý¿¡ µû¸¥ »ó¾ÆÁúÀÇ Àü´Ü°áÇÕ°­µµ¸¦ 24½Ã°£ ÈÄ¿Í 3½Ã°£ Â÷¾Æ¿°¼Ò»ê³ªÆ®·ý ½ÃÈ¿ ó¸® ÈÄ¿¡ Æò°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. µÎ °¡Áö ¹ü¿ëÁ¢ÂøÁ¦ (All-Bond Universal and Scotchbond Universal)¿Í 3´Ü°è »êºÎ½ÄÇü Á¢ÂøÁ¦ (Scotchbond Multipurpose) ¹× 2´Ü°è ÀÚ°¡ºÎ½ÄÇü Á¢ÂøÁ¦ (Clearfil SE Bond)¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù. 180°³ÀÇ ¹ß°ÅµÈ ¿ìÄ¡ÀÇ ¼øÃø »ó¾ÆÁúÀ» ³ëÃâ ½ÃŲ ÈÄ ÀÚ°¡ÁßÇÕ·¹Áø¿¡ Æ÷¸ÅÇÏ¿´´Ù. »ó¾ÆÁú ºÎ½Ä¹æ¹ý°ú »ç¿ëµÈ Á¢ÂøÁ¦ÀÇ Á¾·ù¿¡ µû¶ó 6°³ÀÇ ±ºÀ¸·Î ³ª´©¾î, °¢ ±º´ç 30°³ÀÇ ½ÃÆíÀÇ ³ëÃâµÈ »ó¾ÆÁú¿¡ Á¢ÂøÁ¦¸¦ Àû¿ëÇÏ°í ¿øÅëÇüÀ¸·Î º¹ÇÕ·¹ÁøÀ» ÃæÀüÇÏ°í ±¤ÁßÇÕ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Á¦ÀÛµÈ ½ÃÆíÀ» »ó¿ÂÀÇ ¹° ¼Ó¿¡ 24½Ã°£ º¸°üÇÑ ÈÄ, 2°³ÀÇ ±ºÀ¸·Î ³ª´©¾î ÇϳªÀÇ ±ºÀº 10% Â÷¾Æ¿°¼Ò»ê³ªÆ®·ý¿¡ 3½Ã°£ º¸°üÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¸¸´É½ÃÇè±â¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© »ó¾ÆÁú Àü´ÜÁ¢Âø°­µµ¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÑ ÈÄ, ±× °á°ú¸¦ one-way ANOVA, Student¡¯s t-test¿Í Tukey HSD test¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÌ ÈÄ ÆÄÀý¸éÀ» ±¤ÇÐÇö¹Ì°æÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© °üÂûÇÏ¿©, ½ÇÆÐ ¾ç»óÀ» ºÐ·ùÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¹ü¿ëÁ¢ÂøÁ¦ÀÇ ·¹Áø/»ó¾ÆÁú °è¸éÀº Áֻ籤ÇÐÇö¹Ì°æÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© °üÂûÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¹ü¿ëÁ¢ÂøÁ¦´Â »êºÎ½Ä ¹æ¹ýÀ̳ª ÀÚ°¡ºÎ½Ä¹ý¿¡ °ü°è¾øÀÌ Àü´Ü°áÇÕ°­µµ¿¡ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù (p>0.05). ½Ãȿó¸®ÇÑ ¸ðµç ±×·ìÀº Àü´Ü°áÇÕ°­µµ°¡ À¯ÀÇÂ÷ ÀÖ°Ô °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´´Ù(p<0.05). NaOCl agingÀ» Àû¿ë ÈÄ, ¹ü¿ëÁ¢ÂøÁ¦´Â »êºÎ½Ä¹æ¹ý°ú ÀÚ°¡ºÎ½Ä ¹æ¹ý¿¡¼­ °¢°¢ÀÇ ´ëÁ¶±º°ú À¯ÀÇÂ÷°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù. ÆÄÀý¸éÀÇ ÁÖ¿äÇÑ ½ÇÆд ȥÇÕÇü (mixed failure)À» º¸¿´´Ù. º» ½ÇÇè¿¡¼­ »ç¿ëµÈ µÎ °¡Áö ¹ü¿ë Á¢ÂøÁ¦´Â Àû¿ë¹æ¹ý¿¡ °ü°è¾øÀÌ ¼ö¿ëÇÒ ¸¸ÇÑ »ó¾ÆÁú Àü´Ü°áÇÕ°­µµ¸¦ º¸¿´À¸¸ç, Á¦ÇÑÀûÀÌÁö¸¸, ½Ãȿó¸®ÈÄ¿¡µµ ´ëÁ¶±º°ú À¯ÀÇÇÑ ¼öÁØÀÇ °áÇÕ ³»±¸¼ºÀ» º¸¿´´Ù.

This study measured the dentin bonding strength of two universal adhesives using different application modes at 24 hours following application and after accelerated aging. All-Bond Universal (AU) and Scotchbond Universal (SU) adhesives were used in this study. A three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive (Scotchbond Multipurpose) and a two-step self-etch adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond) were used as controls. One hundred eighty extracted bovine incisors were trimmed by exposing their labial dentin surfaces and embedded in cylindrical molds. Prepared specimens were randomly divided into six groups according to application mode (etch-and-rinse and self-etch) and type of adhesive. Thirty specimens were used for each group to determine the shear bond strength (SBS) of each adhesive to dentin. The exposed dentin surfaces were treated according to a protocol. Composite resin was applied on the treated surfaces and cured. Specimens were stored in water for 24 hours at room temperature. Specimens were assigned to two subgroups of aging or not. Shear bond strength was determined and data was analyzed using the one-way analysis of variance, Student¡¯s t-test, and Tukey HSD test. Fractured surfaces were examined to determine the mode of failure. The resin/dentin interfaces of universal adhesives that underwent aging were analyzed under SEM. There was no significant difference in the SBS of universal adhesives in etch-and-rinse mode compared with self-etch mode, regardless of aging (p>0.05). There were also no significant differences in all groups after aging. The predominant mode of failure for specimens was mixed failure, except for AU in etch-and-rinse mode after aging. Conclusion For two universal adhesives, the mode of application did not affect their SBS to dentin, regardless of aging in sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl). The SBS of two universal adhesives was not significantly different after aging in either etch-and-rinse or self-etch mode compared to controls.

Å°¿öµå

¹ü¿ëÁ¢ÂøÁ¦; »ó¾ÆÁú Á¢Âø; »êºÎ½Ä¹ý; ÀÚ°¡ºÎ½Ä¹ý; Àü´Ü°áÇÕ°­µµ
Dentin boding; Self-etch; Shear bond strength; Etch-and-rinse; Universal adhesive

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI